Monday, June 26, 2006

Rubashkins Violent, Aggressive Assault on Yisrael Best - NEW LETTER by Best

Photo above is from the Video File, where we see Rubashkin removing his jacket in what appears to be his PREMEDITATED move to get ready to Attack and Assault (immediately preceding his engaging Yisrael Best).

Rubashkin engaged Best several times that Monday Night.

When he assaulted him physically, the first time, he had his jacket on. Shortly thereafter, he engaged him once more (first removing his jacket) but this second attack (the photo above) fortunately was only verbal (although the stage was clearly set to be physical as well, as you can see for yourslef, in the photo). Tis first attack with the jacket on was highly violent and physical.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Mara Deasra Harav Schwei Shelita EVICTED by Vaad Hakohol Members - Rubashkin, Plotkin and Lang

Click to Download PDF Eviction Letter

The Eviction is officially addressed to the "Secretary" of the Mara Deasra with the Full Knowledge that Rabbi Schwei would Fear for His Life to be ALONE in the office with a Convicted Felon, Rubashkin, who has already assaulted several people including Yisroel Best just a few days ago - without the protection and help of his secretary.

Anyone who remains silent and refuses to protest against the Outrageous Chutzpah against the Eviction of the Mara Deasra, Abir Shebeabirim, Harav Aharon Yaakov Schwei Shelita - from the Badataz Offices, now becomes a Partner's in the Eviction, with Rubashkin and Company.

Click to Download PDF Eviction Letter

Didan Notzach! Court Barrs Krinsky and Shemtov from any Baal'Habitshkeit over the Rebbe's Shull - Congregation Lubavitch Inc.

Click to Download PDF File of Court Decision
in favor of the Shull, Congregation Lubavitch


Click to see Krinsky's FAILED VERSION,
seeking control of the Shull, which the Judge Rejected
(Note Page 10 in the PDF, where Krinsky tried but failed to win Control of the Shull)

Dated June 19th 2006

Judge Ira B. Harkavy ruled as follows:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that, neither MERKOS nor AGUDAS may eject Congregation Lubavitch Inc. prior to the granting of an order or judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction permitting such ejectment and it's further

This was a VERY major defeat for Krinsky and Shemtov who were seeking control of the 770 Shull and to eject the Gaboim of the Rebbe's Shull. The Judge also said that the Building Structure belonged to Merkos and Agudas, but that was never in dispute by the Gaboim, since the gaboim never had any interest in the structure except for the Shull where they still continue to maintain Control.

While Krinsky could have rights to the general outside structure to affix his Zaya Plaque on the structure of the building, he will no doubt also be barred from doing so at the entrance to the Shull, when the case will undoubtedly be appealed to a higher court.

DaasHakohol legal analysts pointed out that:

Judge Harkavy decision, totally failed to address the precise location of the Plaque.

Merkos and Aguch ownership of the structure, could give them the right to affix a plaque of their choice at the ENTRANCE to 784-788 (On Top of the Porch - Entrance to Krinsky's Offices) - but NOT at the Entrance to Shull where Judge Harkavy Barred Merkos and Aguch access!

Since the Judge failed to address the precise Location of the Plaque or even if he did their was no basis for the precise location to be at the entrance to the Shull, Rather than at the entrance to Krinsky's Offices - It is therefore, practically certain, that the shull (Congregation Lubavitch) will win this on Appeal.

New Letter - 23 Sivan - Mara Deasra, Horav Schwei Shelita says: Not only is it permissible but an OBLIGATION to take Rubashkin to Court


Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Yisroel Best Headed to the Hospital - Rubashkin Heading Back to Fort Dix Prison - by Phone RECORDED Psak Din of the Mara Deasra Rabbi Osdoba Shelita

Moshe Rubashkin illegally called a N'tzigim meeting today in his house to impeach Leibish Nash, for following the clear din in Shulchan Aruch, that when someone refuses to come to a Din Torah, he can then be sued in secular court.

At the meeting, N'tzigim Chairman Yisroel Best attempted to take a roll call.

Rubashkin did not allow Best to speak, insisting that he was no longer the Chairman, since Rubashkin has already replaced him with his crony, Benny Raskin (who is not really a N'tzig anyway, as his Shul has removed him for his complicity in Rubashkin's crimes).

When Best patiently continued calling the roll from a list he held in his hands. Suddenly it dawned on Rubashkin that he did not have the votes to impeach Nash, whereupon he flew into a rage and grabbed the list out of Best's hands and crumpled it up.

When Best attempted to reach for the list, Rubashkin violently assaulted him and repeatedly punched him in the head until he was restrained by several people.

Best suffered head trauma, a broken tooth, a broken or dislocated jaw, broken glasses, a big gash on his forehead, and several severe bruises. He is currently in the hospital for evaluation and treatment. (Please say a kapitel Tehillim for his refua shleima.)

Needless to say, this felony assault can result in a lengthy jail sentence for Mr. Rubashkin. Therefore, Best hesitated to press charges and have Rubashkin arrested.

While Best was being taken to the hospital, he requested that a p'sak be obtained from a Rov as to whether he should file charges against Rubashkin.

The Moro D'asro, Rabbi Schwei was consulted, but he refused to pasken, since Rubashkin has withheld his check for several months, causing him to be biased against Rubashkin. Rabbis Mangel and Bogomilsky were also consulted but they were hesitant to pasken on such a grave matter.

Finally, the Moro D'asra, Rabbi Osdoba was called. Rabbi Osdoba was told the entire story without identifying the parties involved and was asked what should be done.

In response, he paskened that charges must be filed immediately and that only afterwards should the perpetrator be called to a Din Torah and if he made amends, perhaps the Beis Din would ask the complainant to drop charges.

Rabbi Osdoba was then told that the perpetrator is on Parole and would probably be imprisoned for many years as a result of the charges.
He responded, "So what? That gives him a right to hit people? That's his problem!"

DaasHakohol.com has learned that the conversation with Rabbi Osdoba was recorded on the caller's Treo cellphone via a recording program called CallRec (see http://blog.treonauts.com/2005/11/treo_call_sound.html).

It is clear as day that Rubashkin is completely out of control. In the court case, new information has come out that indicates that Rubashkin's criminal actions and g'neivos far exceed anything the plaintiffs ever imagined. His violent behavior shows that he will stop at nothing to hold onto power.

If he is not stopped, Rubashkin is liable to literally KILL someone based on Rabbi Osdoba and Segal's p'sak din that they're mosrim and that they have a "DIN RODEF"

Following Rabbi Osdoba's clear p'sak, Best will file charges upon his release from the hospital.

DaasHakohol.com hopes Rubashkin will see the writing on the wall and resign from the Va'ad Hakohol in order to spare himself a lengthy prison sentence.

If he does not, he will have only himself to blame.


Click to Download NEW LETTER From Rabbi Schwei where he says:
"Not Only is it Permissible to go to court but it an OBLIGATION
To go to court so that we can Remove Rubashkin from Power


Click Here to Download 4 Page Netzigim Letter PDF
Explaining Why the community is forced to take Rubashkin to Court


Click for a Link to Fort Dix

Click to see Rubashkin's status in Fort Dix (subject to change)

Monday, June 19, 2006

Netzigim Explain why they Joined the Court Case against Rubashkin, in accordance with the PSAK DIN of the Mara Deasra Harav Schwei Shelita

Friday, June 16, 2006

Mara Deasra of the Badataz of C.H., Rabbi Osdoba Shelita - Applies "DIN RODEF" on several members of the community, for going to Court!



Click Here to Download PDF of the above letter

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Special Fund Established to Compensate for Rubashkin's Refusal to Pay the Salary of the Mara Deasra, Harav Schwei Shelita

To all residents of Crown Heights:

Unfortunately, for the past few months the Va'ad Hakahal has not paid the salary of Harav Schwei, who works tirelessly on behalf of the community, as we are all aware. Therefore, a temporary fund has been established for this purpose of paying Rabbi Schwei's salary. This fund will be administered by the undersigned, and will cover Rabbi Schwei's salary and his expenses related to the Beis Din.

We turn to all members of the community to loan funds to this fund, so as to allow Rabbi Schwei to receive his rightful compensation for the dedicated work he does on behalf of the community. The loans will be repaid when the Va'ad Hakahal meets its obligations.

Checks should be made payable to: Special Account
and sent to this address: 1276 President St., Brooklyn, NY 11213

Or given to one of the signers below

Signed: Abba Paltiel, Baruch Bush, Yosef Boruch Spielman, Mordechai Chein, Yosef Yitzchok Spalter, Refoel Wilschansky, Leibish Nash, Chanina Sperlin


Torah Says: You May Take Someone to Court if he Refuses Din Torah

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Chabad.Info Published Article - The Truth regarding False Allegations against the Vaad Hakohol - Severely Criticizes Segal


Translated from Hebrew - Updated Wed. 8:30pm

Earlier this week, Segal, interviewd by the Anti Meshichist, Machlokes, Loshon Hora web site, known as Col (which always battles and belittles the Badataz and all Meshichisten,) Segal chose to Attack a honorary member of the Vaad Hakohol, Reb Leibish Nash, referring to him as a “RODEF” which essentially means that Segal was implying and insinuating, legitimizing, Attempted Murder, against Nash, Chas V’Sholom, as Segal specifically hinted this in his interview.

Crown Heights residents were shocked and outraged, how any person who is attempting to become a Chaver Habadatz, can dare to stoop so low, for such an interview, while using such expressions unfit for any self respecting person, never mind someone interested, to eventually be a Rov by Yidden, anytime in the future.

The Real Story:

We are not speaking about any one individual but rather a very large group of Anash, residents of the neighborhood, who all stand united, in the court case, whose intent it is, to preserve the C.H. neighborhood and its funds from the dictatorship of one individual who single handedly uses the funds as he wishes without any supervision or accountability. We are dealing with a Fisher type of Dictatorship where he too used the community funds for his private interests, until a group of Anash (including Brook) succeeded in removing Fisher, then the “Rosh Hakohol”, from his dictatorship.

The court complaint, by a large group of Anash, was originally filed by two Vaad Hakohol members, Leibish Nash and Chanina Sperlin, However, since Boimelgreen threatened Sperlin that he will invest 1 Million Dollars for private investigators, in order to try and dig up some possible dirt against Sperlin and to try and use whatever he may find, as a Baseless Mesira (As the Misnagdim did against Chassidim) and then, Rubashkin too, joined in, to threaten Sperlin’s Entire Family – Sperlin then reluctantly had to remove his name from the legitimate complaint against Rubashkin, out of fear that the two of them (Rubashkin, Boimelgreen) who have no integrity will actually do the unthinkable.

It’s noteworthy that the plaintiffs had first called Rubashkin to a Din Torah, by a Beis Din comprised of the Mara Deasra Harav Aaron Yaakov Schwei and with him the Rabbonim the Geonim, who were always sitting at Din Torah’s in the Badatz, for many years, Rabbi Nissan Mangel and Rabbi Shumel Pesach Bogomilsky – who all together had called Rubashkin to “a Din Torah by Zabla”, but Rubashkin refused any Din Torah by Zabla.

Not only did Rubashkin not agree to come to a Din Torah of Zabla, but in order for Rubashkin to establish a Monopoly in the Badatz, Rubashkin attempted Elections which he conducted against the will of the majority of the C.H. Community, using undemocratic methods, including forging the Election Results.

All this, was done, in order that Rubashkin, should be able to install, his personal candidate, Segal, with 2 more of Rubashkin’s followers, into the Badatz. Rubashkin was hoping, to then have a fake “majority”, to appose Rabbi Schwei, so that Rubashkin will be able to evade accountability and real Justice in any Real Din Torah.

However by Rubashkin doing all this, he created an unprecedented, huge split and Machlokes in the community, including a split in the Vaad Hakohol, Netzigim and the Shulls they represent.

Rubashkin and his people, could care less about all of the incredible Destruction and Machlokes they have caused. To them, their Corrupt Machlokes is a Means to an End, for them to be able to achieve their ultimate corrupt goals.

In order to enforce a Din Torah or when a defendant refuses to appear to a Din Torah, the Rabbonim may permit the Plaintiff to proceed with his complaint in court. Since it involves huge sums of community funds and corrupt management of communal affairs the above Rabbonim permitted the plaintiffs to file the case against Rubashkin, in court, to rescue the funds and the community from Rubashkin’s corrupt dictatorship.

The complaint voiced by Rubashkin’s supporters that it is forbidden to go to court because this can cause Rubashkin to go to Prison, is ridiculous:

First of all, anyone who voices such a compliant is himself admitting that in truth, according to Rubashkin’s Friends, knowledge, Rubashkin does indeed embezzle funds to such an extent that he is likely to get locked up for it by the authorities. If so, it’s incredible, how Segal who holds the above opinion of Rubashkin, can dare to continue to support him in spite of Segals implied admission that Rubashkin is guilty of gross embezzlement of community funds and corrupt dictatorship, control of the entire community.

Besides, if Rubashkin doesn’t want to go to Jail, he has an extremely simple solution: To go to a Din Torah by Zabla!

None of the Plaintiffs are interested in bringing Rubashkin to justice in court per say. The plaintiffs only intent is stop all the financial and communal, wrongdoing by Rubashkin period. It’s only because Rubashkin refuses a Din Torah by Zabla, which left the plaintiffs with no other choice but to proceed in court. But clearly, the second Rubashkin, actually, fully complies with a Din Torah of Zabla, the case against him could and would be dropped instantly.

The cliché used by the Rubashkin clique, that any attempt to stop Rubashkins Dictatorship; “Endangers Peace in C.H. and Destroys the Unity in C.H.” is ridiculous, primarily when it is heard from Segal, whose entire posture in the community holds the key to all of the divisiveness and Machlokes which dominates C.H. in recent months.

If Peace and Unity is so important to Segal, he should have the decency and respect to answer to the Call by Zikney Anash (Elder Chassidim). Segal should proclaim that since the Elections held by Rubashkin, we improper, without any sense of Justice and against the will of the majority of C.H., who boycotted the Elections, in protest –

(This Segal knows, all to well. In fact he himself participated in helping to structure the language of the Joint agreement to postpone the Elections and to be conducted by a neutral party and not by Rubashkin) –

Segal, out of all people, should be the first to say, that he doesn’t recognize these corrupt “elections” and therefore he is not undertaking any resulting communal position.

In general it’s absurd that a person like Segal who receives a salary of $30,000 per year, from non other than from Rubashkin himself, supposedly as a “Chaver Habadatz”, and he knows full well, that Rubashkin is withholding Rabbi Schwei’s Salary, only because, Rabbi Schwei doesn’t approve of Segal’s, improper involvement in the Badatz, it’s incredibly absurd that such a person like Segal should even mix in at all on behalf of and for the benefit of Rubashkin.

It’s even more absurd, that Segal, who himself refuses to appear to a Din Torah of Zabla, should even dare to preach to others about any concept of Torah Justice!

To get a full picture, we bring you the following Links for additional background information:

1) Confirmation from the Rabbonim permitting Rubashkin to be taken to Court

2) Letter from the Rabbonim – Siruv against Segal – for his refusal to a Din Torah by a Beis Din of Zabla

3) Letter from Zikney Hachassidim to Segal

4) Letter from the attorney Eliyahu Polterak, in English, where he testifies in great detail about all the facts surrounding the “elections”, who broke the agreement after it was signed by both Rabbonim and what did Segal do for Peace in CH

5) Letter from the attorney Eliyahu Polterak, Translated to Hebrew

After you see the entire picture, each and every one may ask himself:

Whom is Segal concerned about? For Himself? For CH? Or For Rubashkin?

Yehi Rotzon, that we should merit the fulfillment of what the Rebbe said that CH will not be dictated by Money but by Tzedek V’Yosher, V’Hames V’Hasholom Ahevu

Additional Details at DaasHakohol.com

האמת על העלילה נגד חברי וועד הקהל

בראשית השבוע התראיין ר' שלמה סגל, לאתר ההשמצה והמחלוקת הידוע, כשהוא תוקף
במילים חריפות את חבר וועד הקהל הרה"ח ר' לייביש נאש, וקובע כי חל עליו דין "רודף", עם כל המשתמע מכך, היל"ת!

תושבי השכונה מאוד נבוכים מהעובדה שאדם שמתיימר להיות חבר הבד"צ – מוצא לנכון לרדת לכזו דיוטא תחתונה ולהתראיין לאתר שכזה, תוך שימוש במילים בוטות שאינן מתאימות לאדם המכבד את עצמו, ובוודאי שלא לאדם המעוניין להיות ביום מן הימים רב בישראל.

לא מדובר באדם אחד, אלא בקבוצה גדולה של אנ"ש תושבי השכונה שעומדים מאחרי הפנייה לבית המשפט, שמטרתה היא להציל את השכונה וכספי הציבור מהשתלטות של אדם יחיד, שעושה בכספי הקהל כרצונו, בלי שקיפות מינימלית. מדובר בהשתלטות נוסח פישר, שגם הוא העביר בשיטתיות את כספי הציבור לניהולו האישי ועשה בהם כרצונו, עד שקבוצת אברכים מאנ"ש התעוררה והוציאה אותו מניהול ענייני השכונה.

התביעה, שכאמור מגובה בקבוצה של עסקנים ואנ"ש מודאגים מתושבי השכונה, הוגשה בתחילה על ידי שני חברי וועד הקהל, הרה"ח ר' חנינא הכהן שפערלין והרה"ח ר' לייביש נאש. רק לאחר שר' ישעי' בוימלגרין התקשר לר' חנינא שפערלין ואיים שישקיע מליון דולר לחוקרים פרטיים על מנת למצוא בו דופי ולהלשין עליו לשלטונות, ור' משה רובשקין הצטרף גם הוא לאיומים, כשהוא מאיים גם על משפחתו המורחבת – נאלץ ר' חנינא להסיר את שמו מהתביעה, מחשש שהשניים יממשו את איומיהם ויעלילו עליו עלילות שווא לשלטונות.

יצויין, כי התובעים תבעו את רובשקין תחילה לדין תורה. בית הדין - שבהרכבו ישב המרא דאתרא וחבר הבד"צ, הרה"ג הרב אהרן יעקב שווי, ואתו עמו הרבנים הגאונים היושבים על מדין בבד"צ של השכונה כמה שנים, הרה"ג ניסן מנגל והרה"ג שמואל פסח בוגומילסקי – זימן את רובשקין לדין תורה, ואף איפשר לו להתדיין בפני זבל"א, אולם רובשקין בחר להתעלם מבית הדין, וסירב להגיע לדיון.

לא זו בלבד שלא הגיע לדיון, אלא שכדי להשיג מונופול בבית הדין, יזם רובשקין בחירות, ערך אותם נגד דעת רוב הציבור, במהלכים בלתי-דמוקרטיים בעליל, כולל זיופים בתוצאות הבחירות. כל זאת, על מנת להכניס את הרב סגל ועוד שנים מאנשיו לבית הדין, ובכך ליצור רוב מול הרב שווי, ולהתחמק מדין תורה. במהלכיו אלו, כידוע לכולם, גרם רובשקין לפילוג עצום בשכונה, כולל המימסד השכונתי - וועד הקהל וועד הנציגים. מסתבר, כי הפילוג העצום וההרס שהותיר בשכונה, לא מעניינים את רובשקין ואנשיו בדרך להשגת מטרותיו.

על מנת לקיים את דין התורה, שכאשר הנתבע מסרב לבוא לדין תורה, רשאים הדיינים להתיר לתובעו בערכאות, ומכיוון שמדובר בכסף רב של ממון-ציבור וניהול כושל של ענייני השכונה, התירו חברי בית הדין הנ"ל לתובעים להגיש את התביעה לבית משפט אזרחי, על מנת להציל עשוק מיד עושקו, דהיינו את שכונת קראון הייטס מידיו של ר' משה רובשקין.

הטענה שאסור לפנות לבית המשפט מכיוון שבעטייה עלול רובשקין לשבת בכלא היא טענה מגוחכת. קודם כל, מי שמשמיע טענה כזאת, מודה למעשה שלפי הידוע לו, רובשקין אכן מועל בכספי הציבור בסדר-גודל כזה שעלול לגרום למעצרו על ידי השלטונות. אם כן, תמוה מאוד שהרב סגל שסבור כך, ממשיך לתמוך ברובשקין למרות המעילות הגדולות שמעל בכספי הציבור. שנית, אם רובשקין אינו רוצה להגיע לבית הכלא, יש לו אפשרות פשוטה מאוד: להגיע לדין תורה! אף אחד מהתובעים לא רואה מטרה קדושה להביא את רובשקין לבית המשפט. המטרה היא להפסיק את הניהול הפוחז של כספי הציבור, וההנהגה הכושלת בענייני הקהילה הקדושה. רק לאחר שרובשקין סירב להגיע לבית הדין, לא נותרה לתובעים ברירה אחרת, אלא לתובעו לבית משפט אזרחי. אך ברור, שבכל רגע נתון יכול רובשקין להגיע לדין תורה תוך התחייבות לקבל את פסק הדין על פי תורה, ואיום המשפט האזרחי יוסר מעליו.

גם הקלישאה הקבועה מבית מדרשו של רובשקין, שכל נסיון לעצור את השתלטותו על הציבור היא "סכנה לשלום השכונה, ופגיעה באחדות השכונה", מגוחכת לחלוטין, בעיקר כאשר היא מושמעת על ידי הרב סגל, מי שכל מעמדו הציבורית מהווה אחד מגורמי המפתח לפירוד והמחלוקת השוררים לצערנו בשכונתנו בחודשים האחרונים. אם כל כך חשוב לרב סגל השלום והאחדות בשכונתנו – יתכבד וייענה לפנייתם של זקני אנ"ש, ויודיע שהיות והבחירות שנוהלו על ידי רובשקין לא היו הוגנות, ללא צדק ויושר ובניגוד לרצונם של רוב תושבי השכונה שלא הגיעו לבחירות בהפגנתיות (את זאת יודע הרב סגל היטב. עובדה: הוא עצמו היה שותף בניסוח הסכם הרבנים לדחיית הבחירות ועריכתם על ידי גוף נייטראלי, ולא על ידי רובשקין) – הוא אינו מכיר בלגיטימיות של ה"בחירות" הללו, וממילא לא לוקח שום תפקיד ציבורי שנובע מהן.

בכלל, מוזר שאדם המקבל מרובשקין 30,000 דולר בשנה למשכורתו בתור "חבר הבד"צ", ויודע שמזה חודשיים עצר רובשקין את משכורתו של הרב שוויי, מכיון שאינו מיישר קו עם מעשיו המפוקפקים – יתערב בכלל בעניין זה לטובתו של רובשקין. מוזר עוד יותר שאדם שבעצמו מסרב להגיע לדין תורה, ידבר על יושר מוסרי ותורני.

להשלמת התמונה הכללית, מצורף בזה המסמכים הבאים:

א. אישור הרבנים להעביר את התביעה נגד רובשקין לבית משפט אזרחי, מכיוון שמסרב להגיע לדין תורה
ב. מכתב הרבנים בנוגע לסירובו לדון בזבל"א של ר' שלמה סגל
ד. מכתבו של עו"ד אליהו פולטרק, בתרגום לעברית – עדות נאמנה ממהלך הנסיונות להגיע להסכם הרבנים, ומיהם הגורמים
שזלזלו בהסכם לאחר שנחתם על ידי שני הרבנים, ואחר-כך טרפדו אותו, ומה עשה הרב סגל למען שלום השכונה.

לאחר ראיית התמונה השלימה, כל אחד יכול לשאול את עצמו: למי הרב סגל דואג – לעצמו, לשכונה או לרובשקין

ויהי רצון שיקויימו בנו תיכף ומיד דבריו של הרבי שבשכונת קראון הייטס, לא ישלוט הכסף, אלא הצדק והיושר. והאמת והשלום אהבו.

פרטים נוספים באתר 'דעת הקהל'

Friday, June 09, 2006

Rubashkin and Renegade Netzigim, risk up to Five Years in Prison for Obstruction of Justice as a results of the Impeachment Attempt to stop the Courts

___________________________
NEWS UPDATE - Sunday 6/11/2006
-------------------------------------------

DaasHakohol and Rubashkin's Council has apparently been effective in persuading Rubashkin and his Renegade Netzigim, to abandon of their "Impeachment Attempt".

DaasHakohol has learned that Rubashkin's Council has advised them, to cancel Mondays Meeting for 3 reasons:

1) Since most Renegade Netzigim aren't willing to sit in Jail for Rubashkin, he can't even get a Quorum to attend his Illegal Netzigim meeting.

2) Rubashkin's Obstruction of Justice is likely to send him back to Fort Dix, since he is still on Probation.

3) Rubashkin's Impeachment Attempt is sure to anger the Judge and help make him loose the case.


In conclusion Rubashkin was advised that he should just pretend like he is trying an Impeachment Attempt, but nothing more than just pretending.

Rubashkin was advised to do this, by claiming that he has not "Canceled" the meeting but rather "only postponed" it until the 19th of the Month, which is Rubashkin's "Yom Hadin", in court.

Then on the 19th, he can then Lie once more and claim to "delay it" once more and so on, continuously - as Rubashkin has done in the past.


Netzigim could be Guilty of Obstruction of Justice, and face 5 years imprisonment if they attempt impeachment to stop the court case!

Click Here for the Definition of Obstruction of Justice and it's implications.

For more details on Obstruction of Justice, be sure to read "questions and answers" in the comments section. Click Here for comments.

Rubashkin has been sending people, to intimidate those involved in the court case against him, saying that the case must be stopped at once so as not to uncover any of Rubashkin’s possible criminal activity which could be a violation of his current probation, resulting in his return to Fort Dix.

At the same time, while Rubashkin is trying to make a “Rachmones Case” out of himself, (that the case against him be dropped out of Rachmones for him,) at the same time he has relentlessly increased all his improper activity which has prompted the court case against him, to begin with.

It never stops to amaze people how someone who fears a violation of his parole and who criticizes others of alleged “Mesira”, yet he himself. Never stops jumping into the Fire, head on, relentlessly.

If their was any truth at all, that anyone is putting Rubashkin in danger, by taking him to court, certainly Rubashkin could just quit what he is doing and reverse the damage and the case would have been dropped against him.

The fact that not only has Rubashkin not backed down but he has increased his wrongful activity and all of Rubashkin’s Lawyers, Aids, Friends and Rabbi’s allow him to continue his reckless behavior, Have proven beyond a doubt, that no one really considers this to be a case of real “Mesira”.

The "Mesira Card" is obviously being falsely played in a desperate effort to discredit the inevitable winners of the current court case against Rubashkin.

Rubashkin’s most recent bizarre action has called for a meeting of his Illegal Renegade Netzigim to assemble in his home in attempt to impeach the Vaad Hakohol members who are taking him to court, for the sole reason that they have dared to take him to court.

This is in effect Rubashkins own Mesira on Himself!

Such action to deliberately undermine the Supreme Court, in such a Chutzpadik way, is sure to be considered the most brazen Obstruction of Justice, by the judge who is currently hearing the case.

Many Netzigim have already said that they will not risk attending this illegal meeting. One prominent Netzig has told DaasHakohol: “As much as I love Rubashkin, I am not ready to go to Jail for him”. Other Netzigim have also expressed similar sentiment.

At the very least, Rubashkin’s Impeachment Chutzpah, against the Judge, is sure to anger the Judge and help win the case against Rubashkin.

It is interesting to note that this is not the first time, that Rubashkin has “shot himself in the foot”. In the past criminal case against Rubashkin, his Brazen Chutzpah against the Judge in the courtroom, is what prompted the Judge to give him a much longer sentence in Fort Dix.

If Rubashkin has not yet learned his lesson from his past, perhaps, at least the Netzigim, will make sure that they can say “Yodeinu Loy Shofcha Es Hadam Hazeh” – to not lend a hand to help Rubashkin “jump into the fire”, Chutzpadik, against the Judge and the Pending case in court.

If Rubashin’s current actions are perceived to be “Suicide” for his own self interests, then at least the Netzigim should not be guilty of “Assisted Suicide”.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

770 Talk - Shavuos 5766 – Anash Public Protest against Lush, Segal and Zirkind

770 was completely filled with men women and children who were awaiting to hear Krias Hatorah and the Aseres Hadibros, when once more Rubashkin and his sympathizers’, succeeded in turning this auspicious and joyous occasion into a blazing Machlokis and Protest scene in the presence of thousand of Rabbonim and Anash, in 770.

It all started, when Anash watched in horror, how the appointed Gabai for the day, Mr. Lush, a close ally of Rubashkin, exploited his position at the Bima to give two of the Aliyos, (traditionally reserved for the most respected members of the community,) to the two disputed candidates who lost the Elections, (to become the Rabbi’s of the community,) when 2/3 of the community stayed home to protest their attempted and failed election by Rubashkin and Company.

Everyone in 770 was thoroughly outraged at Lush, particularly in regards to his giving the Aliya to Segal, against whom their is not only a Siruv from Rabbi Schwei & Beis Din, but there is also a Psak Din (Rabbinical Ruling) by Rabbi Schwei & Beis Din which expressly prohibits giving any Aliya, at all to Segal, because of the Siruv against him. This Psak Din was prominently displayed in the Official Gaboim’s Letter Box, in 770.

As soon as Segal and Zirkind were given the Aliya, Several members of Anash publicly protested against this shameful act of giving Aliyos to people who masquerading as Elected Rabbi’s of the community, while in fact they are not. Especially against Segal who is also in contempt of Rabbinical Court to appear to Beis Din of Zabla to face the charges against him.

“They Are Not Rabbonim and that they should not be given Aliyos for the sole purpose to try and help them be perceived as though they were the Elected Rabbonim, which they are not”, Anash were protesting.

Krias Hatorah, at Aseres Hadibros, in 770 is the only time of the year, where not only is 770 filled with Men Women and Children, but in particular it is filled with all of the worlds greatest Lubavitcher Rabbonim from all 5 continents, who always make it a point to come to 770, on Shavuos.

The protest against Gabai Lush, giving Aliyos to those masquerading as Elected Rabbi’s, was very well received and applauded by the vast majority of Anash who agreed that the Gaboim have no right to take sides in the disput between the 2 Rabbonim.

After Davening, the first day of Shavuos and Shabbos at the Farbrengens, everyone was talking about it in 770.

Mashpiim pointed out that perhaps the most significant element of the Machoah, was the fact that it was done in front of all the most prominent Lubavitcher Rabbonim, from all over the world, and absolutely non of them protested against it, which clearly proves that this protest was officially accepted by all Rabbonim throughout the world.

Mashpiim quoted the famous saying of our sages: “Mideshasku Rabonon,…. Shma Mina D’Odu Ley”, Our sages say that Whenever a major event of great significance happens in front of many great Rabbonim and they remain silent, this means that they Approve. In this case, since no one protested against the Machoah, it clearly indicated that it has the unanimous approval of all of the hundreds of the world wide Lubavitch Rabbi’s who were present in 770 at this most auspicious moment of Aseres Hadibros!

It was for this very same reason, that the Rebbe himself had also voiced his own protest against the Gaboim of 770, several years ago, when the Rebbe said it was an Arkesa D’mesane, when Gaboim deliberately exploit giving the most prominent Alyos, to the wrong people, for the sole purpose of undermining the position of those who truly are the proper Elected Rabbonim.

Similarly, at the Main Farbrengen in 770, the second day of Shvuos, which is always attended by all of the greatest Lubavitcher Rabbonim from all over the world, many spoke out about a variety of issues. Rabbi Glukowsky from Israel, who is the main Secretary and coordinator of the entire Lubavitch Rabbinical organization of all of Israel, was also granted the opportunity to speak at this grand central farbrengen in 770.

Rabbi Glukowsky spoke about Shalom, Peace, in the community, which was understood by everyone to be referring specifically to the Rabbonim issues. However, even Rabbi Glukowsky, like all other world wide Rabbonim in 770, did not dare to criticize the public protest in 770, against Lush and against the Segal and Zirkind, which stated that they were not the elected Rabbonim and should not be treated as such.

The Grand Farbrengen in 770 on Shavuos was attended by Rabbi Schwei as ususual, however Rabbi Osdoba was not seen at this Farbrengen in 770 (nor at the previous Shabbos Achdus, farbrengen before Shavuos).

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Renegade Netzigim Cancel Meeting at Last Minute


As reported on Daas HaKohol, the Rubashkin Renegade Netzigim called a Netzigim meeting for this past Tuesday, May 30.

At the last minute the meeting was canceled with no explanation.

Below is a letter that Daas HaKohol received (which likely playd a role in the sudden cancelation). It was written by a Netzig (who asked that his name not be publicized) to Yankel Wice, who called the meeting.

Click here, Link # 1 for the previous report on this issue

Click here, Link # 2 for the background story on this issue

Click here, Link # 3 for additional Background information on this issue

--------

Yankel Wice, May 25 2006

I am in receipt of a letter you sent me inviting me to a Netzigim meeting to take place on May 30 at the Shalom Center. I wish to notify you that I will not attend such a meeting since it is an illegal meeting for the following reasons. You are NOT the Chairman of the Netzigim and have no right to represent yourself as such and have no authority to call meetings. Therefore, the stationary used for the invitation, constitutes forgery and fraud.

Only the Chairman or secretary may send out notifications of meetings, regardless if meetings may be initiated by other parties as per the bylaws.The legally elected members of the Executive Committee are, Yisroel Best, Yisroel Sandhaus, Yisroel Landa, Mendel Schneerson and Mendel Shechter. Any meeting must be approved by those persons. Changing the stationary to reflect different names is an act of forgery and has legal consequences.

As for your meeting that took place in Rubashkin’s house that supposedly elected a new board, anything that took place there is null and void and has no legal basis to it whatsoever. Even if according to the bylaws the Chairman of the CHJCC has the right to call for a meeting, it does not give him the right to chair a Netzigim meeting . He also does not get to choose the time and venue of such a meeting. Any meeting would have to be arranged by the Executive Committee at the request of the Chairman of the CHJCC.

Even when the meeting has been arranged in the legally prescribed manner I have just described, he then would only be able to use the meeting for purposes that relate to the CHJCC/Vaad Hakohol. He has no right to meddle into internal matters of the Netzigim and definitely has no right to call for an election in an organization that he is not a member of. Elections for Netzigim are purely an internal matter which can not be performed by a member of the CHJCC or Vaad Hakohol ,and there are no bylaws giving him any such rights.

Besides that, according to the bylaws, elections are held once a year and a legal election was held in September of 2005. Also, many of those members in attendance of the illegal meeting are not even representatives of any Shul. They were just appointees of Moshe Rubashkin in his arbitrary manner. …. Therefore, for all of the above, your board is illegal and you have no right to call for any meetings and any actions or declarations you make are totally null and void.


In addition to the above legal reasons, you are also in violation of the Code of Jewish Law. You and your colleagues in this matter have been summoned to a Beis Din to answer charges for falsifying the stationary of the Netzigim and misrepresenting yourselves. The Beis Din has issued a preliminary injunction against you and your colleagues ordering you to refrain from any actions in the name of the Netzigim. It also recognizes the above named current Executive Committee as the only ones authorized to speak in the name of the Netzigim.

You are in contempt of Beis Din for violating the injunction, as well as for refusal to appear before the Beis Din or to appear at a binding arbitration acceptable by all parties known as a Zabla. At a meeting of the Netzigim that took place the past winter, you personally requested that your name be removed from the Complaint in Beis Din, saying that you agree to recognize the above-mentioned board and withdraw any challenge you may have had in the past. The minutes of the meeting will reflect that admission. By attending the meeting in Rubashkins house you have reneged on a commitment that was made in public and on the record, in addition to it being illegal by itself.

I therefore ask you to cease and desist from these illegal activities that are very divisive by nature, and is also a major cause of strife in our Community.

Sincerely,

(Name withheld by request)

Sunday, May 28, 2006

DaasHakohol - EXCLUSIVE - Rubashkin, Court Case Files !


770 News and Views – Shabbos Mevorchim Hachodesh Sivan - Shabbos Achdus!

The entire Shabbos in 770 was filled with an overwhelming atmosphere of Shalom and Achuds, where all Mashpiim were brainstorming ideas of how to bring about peace in our community.

Before Musaf, the speaker in 770 began his speech with a story from Rabbi Mindel who was called in by the Rebbe, and told him that he just received a Letter from a Jew in Sing Sing Prison. The Rebbe expressed great pain asking:

“What is a Jew Doing in Sing Sing Prison”?

The speaker connected it, to a Jew in the Midbar and to Shalom and Achdus.

After Davening, Mashpiim in 770, Farbrenged the entire Shabbos, to try and find ways to make Sholom between the Rabbonim and the entire community who are divided, taking on different sides of the Machlokes.

The Call for Peace and Compromise was loud, clear and unanimous, but it remains to be seen if the Rubashkin hardliners will be willing to compromise and reach a lasting agreement.

Everyone at the Frbrengen agreed that the best chance for peace was the fair and equitable agreement reached on Apr. 30th to cancel the illegal elections. Although both sides signed the agreement before the elections, yet Rubashkin’s side refused to honor the agreement signed by their own people, on Election Day.

After Mincha in 770:

Rabbi Y.Y. Jacobson spoke at the special Kinus Achdus Farbrengen where all Anash assembled to unite in accordance with the Rebbe’s Bakasha Nafshis:

Rabbi Jacobson told many stories on the theme of Achdus, while speaking out publicly against the current Machlokes of the Rabbonim. He said in the name of Rabbi Marlow that all Machlokes stems from the desire for Money and Kovod (i.e. Power) and that it wasn’t worth having the entire community destroyed, for this and that a compromise must be reached at once.

Rabbi Jacobson pointed out that Yidden have always had their differences but settled matters at an impartial Beis Din who sometimes decided who is absolutely right and who is wrong and sometimes the Beis Din would reach a Pshara – a fair compromise.

Everyone listening to the Farbrengen, said that Rabbi Jacobson was right and the only reason the Machlokes is unsolvable in CH, today, is only because Rubashkin an his team have so far refused all reasonable efforts at peace and compromise, including a call to a Din Torah by an impartial Beis Din of Zabla which resulted in the Beis Din issuing a Psak Din against Rubashkin, to permit having him sued in court.